/ Reading: 3 min.

17. Nov.
/ Germany
Car-free city: meaningful reform or wishful thinking?
Looking at our society from a above perspective without any prior knowledge, it seems as if the idea of a planet with endless resources has strongly manifested itself in the minds of people. A prime example of this way of thinking is the current use of motorised individual transport. If I want to drive, I have a seat in my car, fill up the tank, fasten my seat belt, press the accelerator and drive off. This way of thinking is dangerous. Motorised individual transport requires that resources are consumed - for a car that weighs 1.5 tonnes on average, that means about 70 tonnes of material only in production. In addition, the car pollutes the environment with every use and takes up too much space, especially in large cities.

The car as a fundamental right
In order to first understand why the car has manifested itself as a « fundamental right » in people’s minds, we must take a look at the age of modernity. Here the image of the car as an object of prestige and a symbol of almost unlimited individual mobility crept into people’s minds. The symbol crept so deeply into people’s minds that their natural habitat was completely geared towards motorised individual transport. Ignoring the fact that it was already clear to researchers in 1960 that the concept of the fully car-friendly city was not a promising one.

Today it is clear that cars are causing air pollutants such as particulate matter, ozone or nitrogen oxides to deteriorate further and further. Ergo: there is a need for reform. So, what about tackling the pulsating restlessness of traffic, the restriction of freedom of movement, the threat to our health and the loss of time and stress caused by long traffic jams by making cities car-free?

Significant changes through car-free cities
Car-free cities are not only good for the environment. City dwellers could live healthier lives, be happier and experience less stress in their daily lives thanks to reduced traffic. And the increasing urbanisation of large cities also clearly shows that more usable space for people needs to be created. However, restructuring a city is not easy. Fundamental changes must be made to the urban infrastructure if motorised private transport is to be reduced sustainably. Bicycle lanes must be built, there must be more space for pedestrians, areas must become greener again and, above all, more emphasis must be placed on the restructuring of public transport. In transport planning, we talk of a push and pull strategy. Enforce restrictions and on the other hand create incentives such as cheaper, expanded local public transport.

One thing is certain, the status quo cannot be maintained. Cities are reaching their infrastructural limits. Governments, countries and cities have to ensure that public transport is improved and that people’s minds change, as has already happened in Madrid, Oslo, Vienna or Amsterdam. But all these measures will not work if we do not all pull together. The Job’s project of traffic change starts with each and every one of us. We must work on our attitudes to make our planet a little bit greener every day.

Dernier article
Why transport planning must be agile

Why transport planning must be agile

Mobility is a highly complex construct, consisting a wide variety of puzzle pieces and dependent on diverse influencing variables. Since the beginning of professional planning of publicly oriented mobility services, public transport authorities and transport companies have been confronted with a multitude of questions and possible answers.

Article associé
Why transport planning must be agile

Why transport planning must be agile

Mobility is a highly complex construct, consisting a wide variety of puzzle pieces and dependent on diverse influencing variables. Since the beginning of professional planning of publicly oriented mobility services, public transport authorities and transport companies have been confronted with a multitude of questions and possible answers.