/ Reading: 4 min.

15. Oct.
/ Deutschland
Perspectives from Prof. Peter Eckart
Prof. Peter Eckart studied product design at the Bergische Universität GHS Wuppertal and later at the Hochschule für bildende Künste Hamburg. In 2000, he founded the design studio unit-design, Frankfurt, Bern, together with Bernd Hilpert, with whom he also works for the Deutsche Bahn. Since 2000 Peter Eckart has been Professor of Integrative Design at the HfG Offenbach and since 2011 Vice President of the University. His central research field is mobility design. Since 2018, he has been leading the interdisciplinary LOEWE research project with Prof. Dr. Kai Vöckler in the fields of urban and transport planning, social science mobility research, multimedia technologies and the design entitled project-mo.de, which focuses on the role of design in changing mobility behaviour.

For those not familiar with the subject, the direct link between modern mobility and design is not necessarily clearly recogniseable. Can you explain in a fewsentences what the direct connection between these two topics is and why it is so important?

Design mediates between human and technology, human and system, human and society, etc. and thus plays a key role in mediating future technology. The automotive industry has known this for a long time. Cars are not sold on a functional or rational level, but always only through intrinsic motives such as status, value, safety, lifestyle etc. At the same time, design makes complex systems understandable by placing users at the centre of development. In the sense of universal design, a product can only be understood by as many people as possible if the interfaces are designed accordingly. This includes all levels of design: the structuring and weighting of information, the form, symbols, feedback, sound, surface, atmosphere etc. Every aspect is a carrier of information and meaning.

What exactly is it that you find so exciting about modern mobility – especially from a design perspective?

I am actually only interested in the idea that future mobility is not determined by the thought of vehicles and infrastructure, but rather by the idea that future mobility is thought of as software, similar to the way digitalisation is thought. Then I as a user can individually determine how I want to move around. Independently, according to my own wishes. Accordingly, the future of mobility should be inter- or multimodal and be seen as a service. Owning your own car is mutually exclusive. The idea of owning changes to accessibility to a system. I am interested in developing such systems in a visionary way, designing ideas and designs for new vehicles, including bicycles, future infrastructure, interfaces or orientation systems.

The interface between mobility and digitalization is also an exciting topic. The digitalization of offers opens up completely new possibilities in the field of mobility: on-demand services, sharing possibilities or simply the possibility of making cashless payments at the PoS via app. Which of all these solutions do you think have particularly strong future potential?

Cashless payment and cross-platform, individualised solutions are certainly the key. At the same time, in terms of design, such systems have the task of being understood by everyone and, above all, of conveying trust. This is what the design does.

Last but not least: Which city do you have in mind when you think of the perfectly designed mobility solution? Is there a prime example in your eyes?

For me, these are always cities in which the own car has no more room and does not take up any space. There are already examples, such as Madrid, Oslo, Vienna or the city centre of Amsterdam, where there is actually no room for your own car. Copenhagen for example has more than 50% bicycle mobility. I also find the idea of spreading tuktuks throughout the city as a public and divisible mobility offer very interesting. Even if you only have pictures of Delhi with traffic jams in your head, these cities would not function without tuktuks. All in all, there are countless individual and mixed projects around the world that aim at a different kind of mobility. Wherever there is a clear objective, also politically, the most exciting changes take place. Especially with Corona. In addition to newly emerging cities in Holland, which are planned to be fundamentally car-free, there are also visionary future models such as the Smart City by BIG Architekten for Toyota, who have perhaps already understood that the future of the automotive industry is not to produce cars, but to sell mobility.

 

Dernier article
Why transport planning must be agile

Why transport planning must be agile

Mobility is a highly complex construct, consisting a wide variety of puzzle pieces and dependent on diverse influencing variables. Since the beginning of professional planning of publicly oriented mobility services, public transport authorities and transport companies have been confronted with a multitude of questions and possible answers.

Article associé
Why transport planning must be agile

Why transport planning must be agile

Mobility is a highly complex construct, consisting a wide variety of puzzle pieces and dependent on diverse influencing variables. Since the beginning of professional planning of publicly oriented mobility services, public transport authorities and transport companies have been confronted with a multitude of questions and possible answers.

Car-free city: meaningful reform or wishful thinking?

Car-free city: meaningful reform or wishful thinking?

Looking at our society from a above perspective without any prior knowledge, it seems as if the idea of a planet with endless resources has strongly manifested itself in the minds of people. A prime example of this way of thinking is the current use of motorised individual transport. If I want to drive, I have a seat in my car, fill up the tank, fasten my seat belt, press the accelerator and drive off. This way of thinking is dangerous. Motorised individual transport requires that resources are consumed – for a car that weighs 1.5 tonnes on average, that means about 70 tonnes of material only in production. In addition, the car pollutes the environment with every use and takes up too much space, especially in large cities.